“Freedom of speech/Just watch what you say.” (Ice T)
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." (Benito Mussolini)
It’s not unusual for politically minded people on Facebook to claim that they’re being targeted and censored. They all think they’re “too radical” in one way or another and thus, must be silenced by the authorities. Hey, in my activist days, I’d even get insulted if I wasn’t pulled off the line to board a plane. Don’t they know who I am? These delusions of grandeur, however, are based on real, longstanding policies. The Land of the Free™ has always spied on, manipulated, and controlled its population. They usually don’t talk openly about it but, last week, White House press secretary Jen Psaki let loose with this truth bomb:
“We are in regular touch with the social media platforms, and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff, but also members of our COVID-19 Team. Given as Dr. Murthy conveyed, this is a big issue of misinformation specifically on the pandemic. In terms of actions that we have taken or we’re working to take, I should say, from the Federal Government, we’ve increased disinformation research and tracking. Within the Surgeon General’s Office, we are flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation.”
Here’s about 45 seconds of her public admission:
The “Dr. Murthy” she mentions is US Surgeon General, Dr. Vivek Murthy — and here’s a recent tweet of his:
When faced with criticism for this unconstitutional stance, Psaki doubled down the next day with a call for bannings to cross all platforms. She mocked comparisons to "Big Brother" and again called for Facebook to step up its efforts. Interesting timing as the government is also threatening Facebook over possibly illegal monopolization. Could it be that the puppet masters behind Biden are offering Zuckerberg a deal in advance? Consider this, also from Psaki’s press conference:
“It’s important to take faster action against harmful posts. As you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes it’s not accurate, and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful violative posts. Posts that would be within their policies for removal often remain up for days. That’s too long. The information spreads too quickly.”
What would The Home of the Brave™ prefer Facebook do? Psaki said The White House is already pressuring the company to use the government’s preferred sources of “quality information” via the newsfeed and its algorithms. Let that one sink in for a while, comrades.
Occupy Wall Street, Zuccotti Park. Photo by Mickey Z. (Sept. 30, 2011)
Will this totalitarian salvo stand? I don’t know but I feel certain that it’ll have plenty of help. The majority of Facebook users will be more than happy to “turn in” anyone who dares to challenges their beloved brand of groupthink. With these unpaid spies doing their work for them, the government (and the corporations that own it) can just sit back and watch all the democracy (sic) in action. Question: What role will YOU play in this scenario?
Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, Mickey Z. can be found here. He is also the founder of Helping Homeless Women - NYC, offering direct relief to women on New York City streets. To help him grow this project, CLICK HERE and donate right now. And please spread the word!
Reliable, unbiased and diverse news sources -- Bing
Finding reliable, unbiased and diverse news sources can be challenging in the era of information...Reliable, unbiased and diverse news sources -- Bing
Finding reliable, unbiased and diverse news sources can be challenging in the era of information overload and media polarization. However, there are some criteria that can help us evaluate the quality and credibility of different news outlets. Some of these criteria are:
- Transparency: A reliable news source should disclose its ownership, funding, editorial policy, sources, corrections and contact information. It should also acknowledge its biases and perspectives, if any, and avoid conflicts of interest or hidden agendas.
- Accuracy: A reliable news source should verify its facts and data before publishing or broadcasting them. It should also correct any errors or mistakes promptly and prominently. It should not distort, omit or fabricate information to fit a certain narrative or agenda.
- Diversity: A reliable news source should represent a variety of voices, opinions and perspectives on different issues and topics. It should not exclude or marginalize any groups or viewpoints based on their identity, ideology or affiliation. It should also seek to cover a wide range of topics and regions, not just those that are popular or profitable.
- Accountability: A reliable news source should be accountable to its audience and the public interest. It should follow ethical and professional standards of journalism, such as fairness, balance, objectivity and independence. It should also respond to feedback, criticism and complaints from its readers, viewers or listeners.
Based on these criteria, some examples of reliable, unbiased and diverse news sources are:
- Associated Press (AP): AP is a global news agency that provides factual and comprehensive coverage of breaking news and current events from around the world. It is owned by its member newspapers and broadcasters, and operates independently from any government or corporate influence. It has a reputation for accuracy, impartiality and speed.
- Reuters: Reuters is another global news agency that delivers fast and accurate reporting on business, finance, politics, sports and entertainment. It is owned by Thomson Reuters Corporation, a multinational media company that adheres to a Trust Principles document that ensures its editorial independence and integrity. It has a diverse team of journalists and correspondents in over 200 locations worldwide.
- BBC: BBC is a public service broadcaster that provides news, information and entertainment across television, radio, online and mobile platforms. It is funded by a license fee paid by UK households, and governed by a Royal Charter that guarantees its editorial freedom and public accountability. It has a global reach and a commitment to impartiality, accuracy and diversity.
- NPR: NPR is a non-profit media organization that produces and distributes news, talk and cultural programming for radio stations across the US. It is funded by donations from listeners, sponsors and foundations, as well as some federal funds. It has a code of ethics that guides its journalism practices and values. It has a diverse staff and audience, and covers a broad spectrum of topics and issues.
- The Guardian: The Guardian is a British newspaper that publishes online and in print editions for the UK, US and Australia. It is owned by the Scott Trust Limited, a charitable foundation that ensures its editorial independence and financial sustainability. It has a progressive outlook and a reputation for investigative journalism and social justice. It has a diverse range of contributors and opinions, as well as an international perspective.Show more
Project charter for World News Trust social news network World News Trust (WNT) is a social news network that aims to provide reliable, unbiased and...
Welcome to the World News Trust social news network. We are dedicated to your privacy and the highest standards of journalistic excellence. Help us build a great news service. Visit our World Desk community to register or log in. See you there.